OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
The petitioner served the respondent with a petition dated June 24, 2003, containing one charge of professional misconduct, and a supplemental petition dated May 6, 2004, containing an additional charge. After a prehearing conference on October 18, 2004, and a hearing on November 9, 2004, at which the respondent failed to appear, notwithstanding notice to him at the prehearing...
Let's get started
![Leagle.com](https://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.