1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 108 P.3d
  5. 108 P.3d 667 (2005)
 

IN RE MARRIAGE OF THANHOUSER

0104-63650; A118484.

108 P.3d 667 (2005)

198 Or. App. 472

In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Julieanne A. THANHOUSER, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, and Edwin W. Thanhouser, Sr., Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 23, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Richard Urrutia, Portland, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. With him on the briefs were Cecil A. Reniche-Smith, Williams Kastner James & Urrutia, and Zimmer & Bunch LLC.

Michael P. Opton, Portland, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. With him on the briefs was Opton & Galton.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, ARMSTRONG, Judge, and KANTOR, Judge pro tempore.

ARMSTRONG, J.

Wife appeals from a dissolution judgment, contending that the trial court erred in its award of spousal and child support. Husband cross-appeals, assigning error to the spousal support award. We reject without discussion the parties' arguments about spousal support and write only to address child support. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3) (2001), we conclude that the trial court erred in its child support award.1 We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases