1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 375 F.Supp.2d
  5. 375 F.Supp.2d 396 (2005)
 

TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE OPERATING CO. v. VISTEON CORP.

No. CIV. 03-1030-SLR.

375 F.Supp.2d 396 (2005)

TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE OPERATING COMPANY INC., Plaintiff, v. VISTEON CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

June 30, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Pazuniak, James Michael Olsen, Francis DiGiovanni, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, L.L.P., Wilmington, DE, Of Counsel: Gary H. Nunes, D. Scott Sudderth, Barry S. Goldsmith, John F. Morrow, Jr., Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, L.L.P., Tysons Corner, VA, Counsel for Plaintiff.

Thomas C. Grimm, Leslie A. Polizoti, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel, Wilmington, DE, Of Counsel: Harold V. Johnson, James R. Sobieraj, Timothy P. Lucier, Brinks, Hofer, Gilson & Lione, Chicago, IL, Raymond J. Vivacqua, James K. Cleland, Brinks Hofer, Gilson & Lione, Ann Arbor, MI, Counsel for Defendant.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION*

SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On November 10, 2003, plaintiff Tenneco Automotive Operating Company filed the present action against defendant Visteon Corporation, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 4,969,264 ("the '264 patent") and 5,118,476 ("the '476 patent") (collectively "the patents in suit"). Fact discovery closed on January 6, 2005 (D.I. 111 at ¶ 1), and expert discovery...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases