1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 543 U.S.
  5. 543 U.S. 209 (2005)
 

WHITFIELD v. UNITED STATES

No. 03-1293.

543 U.S. 209 (2005)

125 S.Ct. 687

160 L.Ed.2d 611

WHITFIELD v. UNITED STATES

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 11, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sharon C. Samek, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 985, argued the cause for petitioners in both cases. With her on the briefs were Thomas C. Goldstein, Amy Howe, Pamela S. Karlan, and Richard Ware Levitt.

Jonathan L. Marcus argued the cause for the United States in both cases. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Clement, Assistant Attorney General Wray, Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben, and Kirby A. Heller.†

JUSTICE O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court.

These cases present the question whether conviction for conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U. S. C. § 1956(h), requires proof of an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. We hold that it does not.

I

In March 1999, a federal grand jury returned a 20-count indictment against petitioners and five codefendants. As relevant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases