1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 354 F.Supp.2d
  5. 354 F.Supp.2d 357 (2005)
 

OSRECOVERY, INC. v. ONE GROUPE INTERN., INC.

No. 02 Civ.8993(LAK).

354 F.Supp.2d 357 (2005)

OSRECOVERY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ONE GROUPE INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 21, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne C. Matus, A. John P. Mancini, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP, New York City, for Plaintiffs.

Lawrence W. Newman, James M. Torre, Baker & McKenzie, New York City, for Defendant Latvian Economic Commercial Bank.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

This is a civil action based on an alleged scheme involving the sale of an allegedly non-existent gold-backed Internet currency and the operation of a massive Ponzi scheme. Latvian Economic Commercial Bank ("Lateko") and Parex Bank ("Parex"), which is also Latvian, allegedly participated in the scheme. The third amended complaint (the "Complaint") asserts claims against the banks under the Racketeer Influenced and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases