PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges an order of involuntary commitment, arguing that the evidence submitted at the hearing did not establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself or to others. The state concedes that the record does not contain evidence sufficient to support the order of involuntary commitment. We accept the state's concession.
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.