1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 355 F.Supp.2d
  5. 355 F.Supp.2d 181 (2005)
 

HOLLY SUGAR CORP. v. VENEMAN

No. CIV.A.03-1739(RBW).

355 F.Supp.2d 181 (2005)

HOLLY SUGAR CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ann M. VENEMAN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 6, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale E. McNiel, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.

Alan Burch, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION1

WALTON, District Judge.

The plaintiffs are challenging the defendants' interpretation of § 163 of the Federal Agricultural Improvement and Reform Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-127, 110 Stat. 935 ("FAIR Act" or "1996 Act"), as amended by § 1401(c)(2) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, Pub.L. No. 107-171, 116 Stat. 187 ("FSRI Act" or "2002 Act"), and codified as amended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases