1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 366 S.C.
  5. 366 S.C. 156 (2005)
 

STONHARD, INC. v. CAROLINA FLOORING

No. 26047.

366 S.C. 156 (2005)

621 S.E.2d 352

STONHARD, INC., Plaintiff, v. CAROLINA FLOORING SPECIALISTS, INC., Daniel Parham, and Manuel T. Parham, Defendants.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided October 10, 2005.

Rehearing Denied November 17, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradford Neal Martin, Laura W.H. Teer, and William S.F. Freeman, all of Walker Martin & Reibold, of Greenville, for Plaintiff.

W. Andrew Arnold and Brian E. Arnold, both of Arnold & Arnold, of Greenville, for Defendants.

Chief Justice TOAL:

Pursuant to Rule 228, SCACR, we accepted the following questions on certification from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina:

I. May a non-compete agreement that contains a New Jersey choice-of-law provision but no geographical limitation be reformed (or "blue penciled") in accordance with New Jersey law and then enforced in South Carolina? II. May a non-compete agreement that is reformed (or "blue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases