Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he used a dangerous instrument to injure the complainant. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hines,
Let's get started
![Leagle.com](https://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.