1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 17 A.D.3d
  5. 17 A.D.3d 392 (2005)
 

CHEEMANLALL v. TOOLSEE

17 A.D.3d 392 (2005)

792 N.Y.S.2d 360

BHOGRAJ CHEEMANLALL et al., Respondents, v. DHANRAJH TOOLSEE, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 11, 2005.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment on the cause of action for specific performance by demonstrating, inter alia, that they complied with their obligations under the subject contract, and were ready, willing, and able to close on the time-of-the-essence closing date (see Paglia v Pisanello, 15 A.D.3d 373

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases