In this postdivorce matrimonial action, the pro se defendant failed to explain properly why supposedly newly discovered evidence was not known at the time of prior postdivorce litigation in 2001, or to offer "reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion" (CPLR 2221 [e] [3]). We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
