WIESENTHAL v. WEINBERG


17 A.D.3d 270 (2005)

793 N.Y.S.2d 422

MARGERY WIESENTHAL et al., Appellants, v. HUBERT WEINBERG, M.D., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 26, 2005.


Failure to rebut medical evidence demonstrating conformity with accepted medical practice was fatal to the cause of action for malpractice (see Pan v Coburn, 95 A.D.2d 670 [1983]). Dr. Weinberg's implant of a silicone gel prosthesis into plaintiff Margery Wiesenthal's breast, allegedly against her express wishes, was correctly deemed a cause of action for battery, which was dismissed as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases