1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 17 A.D.3d
  5. 17 A.D.3d 245 (2005)
 

KASHELKAR v. MAHARASHTRA MANDAL NEW YORK, INC.

17 A.D.3d 245 (2005)

793 N.Y.S.2d 399

SHOBHA KASHELKAR et al., Appellants, v. MAHARASHTRA MANDAL NEW YORK, INC., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 21, 2005.

The action was properly dismissed based on plaintiffs' failure to comply with prior court orders conditionally dismissing the action unless plaintiffs served a complaint upon an attorney whom, they claim, was never properly substituted for defendants' original attorney and therefore lacks authority to represent defendants (CPLR 3012 [b]; see Lusker v 85-87 Mercer St. Assoc., 272 A.D.2d 278 [2000]). Since plaintiffs offer no excuse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases