The action was properly dismissed upon undisputed facts that in the months preceding plaintiff's application for the subject insurance, plaintiff knew that its chief executive officer and president had been found civilly liable for fraud, and that he was claiming in the context of plaintiff's bankruptcy proceeding, spuriously according to plaintiff, that he, not plaintiff, was the true owner of plaintiff's subsidiary. Clearly, plaintiff did not regard this claim as mere posturing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
