MITCHELL v. OKSIENIK


880 A.2d 1194 (2005)

380 N.J. Super. 119

Lori MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Richard OKSIENIK, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 2, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janet L. Porro, Pompton Plains, argued the cause for appellant.

William N. Dimin, Englewood, argued the cause for respondent (Spector & Dimin, attorneys; Mr. Dimin, on the brief).

Before Judges KESTIN, LEFELT and FUENTES.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

KESTIN, P.J.A.D.

Defendant, Richard Oksienik, appeals from an order entered by the trial court on October 28, 2003, in a proceeding initiated under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act of 1991 (the Act), N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17 to -35. The matter began with the filing of the complaint on July 28, 1997, in which plaintiff, Lori Mitchell, sought an order under the Act.1

The amended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases