The award appropriately reflects the parties' economic disparity, defendant's control over his receipt of income from a business in which he is the sole shareholder, the complexity of the litigation, and evidence of the nature and extent of the legal and appraisal services rendered, and is otherwise a proper exercise of discretion (see DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
WECHSLER v. WECHSLER
19 A.D.3d 157 (2005)
796 N.Y.S.2d 593
SHARON WECHSLER, Respondent-Appellant, v. NORMAN WECHSLER, Appellant-Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 7, 2005.
June 7, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.