1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 380 F.Supp.2d
  5. 380 F.Supp.2d 989 (2005)
 

FRAZIER v. LAYNE CHRISTENSEN CO.

No. 04-C-315-C.

380 F.Supp.2d 989 (2005)

William C. FRAZIER, Frazier Industries, Inc. and Airburst Technologies, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY and Prowell Technologies, Ltd., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

August 4, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jane C. Schlicht, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiffs.

Bruce A. Schultz, Coyne Niess Schultz Becker & Bauer, Madison, WI, for Defendants.

OPINION and ORDER

CRABB, District Judge.

Plaintiffs William Frazier, Frazier Industries, Inc. and Airburst Technologies, LLC have moved for reconsideration of the order granting summary judgment to defendants Layne Christensen Company and ProWell Technologies, Ltd. on plaintiffs' claims of patent infringement, inducement of infringement and contributory infringement. Plaintiffs contend that defendant Layne Christensen's processes for rehabilitating water...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases