1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 386 F.Supp.2d
  5. 386 F.Supp.2d 965 (2005)
 

SPARKNET COMMUNICATIONS v. BONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL

No. 05 C 2677.

386 F.Supp.2d 965 (2005)

SPARKNET COMMUNICATIONS, L.P., a Nevada limited partnership, and Sparknet Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiffs, v. BONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a Utah Corporation, Defendant. Bonneville International Corporation, a Utah Corporation, Counterclaimant, v. SparkNet Holdings, Inc., A Nevada Corporation, Counterdefendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

September 9, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Derek A. Newman, Newman & Newman, Seattle, WA, Charles Lee Mudd, Jr., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.

David W. Quinto, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Andrew B. Bloomer, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.

The music radio industry is highly competitive and radio stations seek to differentiate themselves in a variety of ways. This case involves a claim for trademark infringement and related state law claims in which the Plaintiffs claim that their "PLAYING WHAT WE WANT®" trademark has been infringed by the Defendant. The Defendant denies that there is a likelihood of confusion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases