On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 24, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
I respectfully dissent. Our state's perjury and witness intimidation laws are indispensable to the maintenance of the integrity of the justice system. In this case, I believe that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.