1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 352 F.Supp.2d
  5. 352 F.Supp.2d 831 (2005)
 

ACCU-TECH CORP. v. JACKSON

No. 03-71575.

352 F.Supp.2d 831 (2005)

ACCU-TECH CORP., Plaintiff(s), v. Hiram JACKSON, et al., Defendant(s).

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

January 20, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. William Cohen, James D. VandeWyngearde, Matthew J. Lund, Mindy M. Schwartz, Pepper Hamilton (Detroit), Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff.

Douglas C. Salzenstein, Robert M. Jackson, Honigman, Miller, (Detroit), Detroit, MI, George A. Sumnik, Joseph H. Heckendorn, Jaffe, Raitt, (Southfield), MI, for Defendants.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [68] AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE [41]

EDMUNDS, District Judge.

There are two matters before the Court: Defendant's motion in limine and Defendant's motion for summary judgment. The issues Defendant presents in the motion in limine are not appropriately addressed at this time; that motion is therefore DENIED. The summary judgment motion requires the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases