The court properly denied defendant's challenges for cause to two prospective jurors. A panelist who was acquainted with crime victims did not exhibit a state of mind that was likely to preclude her from rendering an impartial verdict based on the evidence adduced at the trial, and her use of the word "think" was not disqualifying (see People v Chambers,
Let's get started
![Leagle.com](https://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.