1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 372 F.Supp.2d
  5. 372 F.Supp.2d 694 (2005)
 

McCARTHY v. DUN & BRADSTREET CORP.

No. CIV.A. 303CV431SRU.

372 F.Supp.2d 694 (2005)

McCARTHY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

June 6, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas G. Moukawsher, Moukawsher & Walsh, Hartford, CT, for Plaintiffs.

Carla R. Walworth, Zachary R. Osborne, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Stamford, CT, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

UNDERHILL, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, a group of retired former employees of the Dun & Bradstreet Corporation ("Dun & Bradstreet"), sued Dun & Bradstreet for allegedly underpaying retirement benefits. Remaining in the case is the sole claim that Dun & Bradstreet's Master Retirement Plan ("the Plan") used an unreasonably high discount rate to "actuarially reduce" benefits paid to early-retiring former employees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases