1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 395 F.Supp.2d
  5. 395 F.Supp.2d 668 (2005)
 

DAGE v. TIME WARNER CABLE

No. C-1-04-90.

395 F.Supp.2d 668 (2005)

Richard DAGE Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

October 19, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie Elizabeth Ghiz, Kohnen & Patton LLP, Randolph Harry Freking, Ann Koize Wittenauer, Kelly Mulloy Myers, Freking & Betz, Cincinnati, OH, for Plaintiff.

Paul A. Wilhelm, Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC, Covington, KY, Peter Kevin Newman, Roetzel & Andress, Cincinnati, OH, for Defendant.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

DLOTT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Pleadings. (Doc. # 15). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant's Motion is DENIED.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Original plaintiff Richard Dage1 ("Dage") sued Time Warner Cable ("Time Warner"), his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases