1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 392 F.Supp.2d
  5. 392 F.Supp.2d 668 (2005)
 

PIECZENIK v. PFIZER, INC.

No. 04CIV.4558(LAK)(RLE).

392 F.Supp.2d 668 (2005)

George PIECZENIK, Plaintiff, v. PFIZER, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 13, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Pieczenik, New York City, pro se.

Adam Gahtan, White & Case LLP, New York City, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

ELLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

On April 8, 2005, plaintiff George Pieczenik filed a motion to limit depositions to three months; appoint a panel of three lawyers experienced in Pieczenik's prior patent litigation to act as counsel to the undersigned; and to consent to jurisdiction over dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Pieczenik's motion is hereby DENIED.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases