1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 309 F.Supp.2d
  5. 309 F.Supp.2d 596 (2004)
 

MEAD v. ANDERSEN, LLP

No. 04 Civ. 484(VM).

309 F.Supp.2d 596 (2004)

Michael MEAD, Plaintiff, v. Arthur ANDERSEN, LLP, and Arthur Andersen LLP Retirement Plan, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 19, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Mead, Woodmere, NY, Pro se.

Eric D. Raphan, McDermott, Will & Emery, New York City, Michael T. Graham, McDermott, Will and Emery, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.

DECISION AND ORDER

MARRERO, District Judge.

The plaintiff brings this lawsuit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. ("ERISA") to recover certain benefits which his former employer allegedly owes him. The employer moves this Court to dismiss two of the three ERISA-based causes of action — one for breach of fiduciary duty and the other seeking equitable relief — as inapplicable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases