OPINION OF THE COURT
CHARLES J. TEJADA, J.
Defendant moves, pursuant to CPL 440.10, to vacate his conviction on the grounds that he was denied his right of confrontation because a tape-recorded 911 telephone caller's statement was admitted into evidence against the defendant in violation of his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation, as held in Crawford v Washington (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.