On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of October 2, 2003 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
MARKMAN, J., concurs and states as follows:
Because I agree that this Court's October 2, 2003 order vacating the June 10, 2003 opinion of the Court of Appeals and remanding this matter to the Court of Appeals for consideration of defendant's remaining claims was not...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.