1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 676 N.W.2d
  5. 676 N.W.2d 1 (2004)
 

MORENO v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS

Nos. A03-837, A03-943.

676 N.W.2d 1 (2004)

Donna MORENO, et al., Appellants, Respondents, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Respondent, v. Minneapolis Institute of Arts, third-party intervenor, Respondent, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 9, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel L.M. Kennedy, Minneapolis, MN, for Moreno and Smith.

Jay M. Heffern, Minneapolis City Attorney, Carol Lansing, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for City of Minneapolis.

John H. Herman, D. Charles Macdonald, Michael A. Ponto, Faegre & Benson LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Minneapolis Institute of Arts.

Considered and decided by HUDSON, Presiding Judge; PETERSON, Judge; and HARTEN, Judge.

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

In 2002, the Minneapolis Institute of Arts (MIA) applied for an amendment to its 1973 planned unit development (PUD) in order to add a new wing. The Minneapolis City Planning Commission (planning commission) approved the MIA's application and the MIA's neighbors (Smith and Moreno) appealed this decision to the Minneapolis City Council. The city council heard and denied the appeal, approving the MIA's application subject to conditions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases