1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 542 U.S.
  5. 542 U.S. 74 (2004)
 

UNITED STATES v. DOMINGUEZ BENITEZ

No. 03-167.

542 U.S. 74 (2004)

124 S.Ct. 2333

159 L.Ed.2d 157

UNITED STATES v. DOMINGUEZ BENITEZ.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 14, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan Himmelfarb argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Olson, Assistant Attorney General Wray, and Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben.

Myra D. Mossman, by appointment of the Court, 540 U.S. 1175, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*

JUSTICE SOUTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

Respondent claims the right to withdraw his plea of guilty as a consequence of the District Court's failure to give one of the warnings required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. Because the claim of Rule 11 error was not preserved by timely objection, the plain-error standard of Rule 52(b) applies, with its requirement to prove effect on substantial rights. The question is what showing must thus be made to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases