1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 541 U.S.
  5. 541 U.S. 1 (2004)
 

RAYMOND B. YATES, M. D., P. C. PROFIT SHARING PLAN v. HENDON

No. 02-458.

541 U.S. 1 (2004)

124 S.Ct. 1330

158 L.Ed.2d 40

RAYMOND B. YATES, M. D., P. C. PROFIT SHARING PLAN, ET AL. v. HENDON, TRUSTEE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 2, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Holifield, Jr., argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners.

Matthew D. Roberts argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Olson, Deputy Solicitor General Kneedler, Howard M. Radzely, Allen H. Feldman, Nathaniel I. Spiller, and Ellen L. Beard.

C. Mark Troutman argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was John A. Walker, Jr.*

JUSTICE GINSBURG delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case presents a question on which federal courts have divided: Does the working owner of a business (here, the sole shareholder and president of a professional corporation) qualify as a "participant" in a pension plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or Act), 88 Stat. 832, as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq. The answer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases