1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 83 Conn.
  5. 83 Conn. App. 442 (2004)
 

TIMBERS v. UPDIKE, KELLY & SPELLACY, P.C.

(AC 24364)

83 Conn. App. 442 (2004)

JOHN TIMBERS v. UPDIKE, KELLY AND SPELLACY, P.C., ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Connecticut.

Officially released June 22, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Timbers, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

Joseph T. Sweeney, for the appellee (named defendant).

David M. Sheridan, for the appellee (defendant Levy & Droney, P.C.).

Schaller, Bishop and Dupont, JS.

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

On March 25, 2003, the pro se plaintiff, John Timbers, commenced an abuse of process action against the defendant law firms, Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. and Levy & Droney, P.C. Each defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiffs cause of action was barred by the three year statute of limitations embodied in General Statutes § 52-577.1 On May 16, 2003...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases