1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 98 P.3d
  5. 98 P.3d 397 (2004)
 

DIMEO v. GESIK

972918; A119453.

98 P.3d 397 (2004)

195 Or. App. 362

David DIMEO, Respondent, v. Darren B. GESIK, Joseph E. Chrisman, and Bonita Jewell Chrisman, Defendants, and Western Bank, a division of Washington Mutual, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 22, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan M. Radmacher, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was McEwen Gisvold, LLP.

Thomas H. Anderson, Mcminnville, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and SCHUMAN, Judges.

WOLLHEIM, J.

This is the second time this case has been before us. In Dimeo v. Gesik, 164 Or.App. 567, 993 P.2d 183 (1999), we reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Dimeo and against defendant Western Bank (the bank). On remand, plaintiff prevailed at trial, and the bank does not challenge that result. After trial, however, the trial court entered a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases