FORTIS BANK (NEDERLAND) N.V., Plaintiff,
Massachusetts Port Authority, et al., Intervenor Plaintiffs
v.
M/V SHAMROCK and Copropriete Du Navire Shamrock, Defendants and
Comatrans, S.A. SP Container Line SA, and SNC Shamrock Gestion, Parties-in-Interest.
United States District Court, D. Maine.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 13, 2004.
September 13, 2004.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Peter S. Plumb, Murray, Plumb & Murray, Sarah A. McDaniel, Murray, Plumb & Murray, Thomas C. Newman, Murray, Plumb & Murray, Portland, ME, for Fortis Bank (Nederland) NV.
Michael J. Rauworth, Cetrulo & Capone, Nancy Kelly, Cetrulo & Capone, Boston, MA, R. Terrance Duddy, Kelly, Remmel & Zimmerman, U. Charles Remmel, II, Kelly, Remmel & Zimmerman, John G. Osborn, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer, & Nelson, Wendy J. Paradis, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer, & Nelson, Marshall J. Tinkle, Tompkins, Clough, Hirshon & Langer, Michael X. Savasuk, Law Office of Michael X. Savasuk, Thomas J. Van Meer, Van Meer & Belanger, P.A., Elizabeth L. Boynton, City of Portland, Portland, ME, for Massachusetts Port Authority, Cerescorp Company, Boston Pilot Association LLC, Boston Line & Service Company, Inc., Halterm Limited, Atlantic Electronics Limited, Union Oil Co of Maine, Michel Remond, Jerzy Rejman, Krzysztof Skarzewski, Boguslaw Silwa, Grzeslaw Bator, Jean Louis Audoux, Andrzej Zielinski, Mariusz Drelinkiewicz, Romuald Kolakowski, Mieczyslaw Zablotny, Garry Heudes, Przemyslaw Czapla, Yves Champdoizeau, Thierry Beaupertuis, Portland Pilots, Inc., City of Portland, Intervenor Plaintiffs.
Michael Kaplan, Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau, Pachios & Haley, LLC, Portland, ME, for M/V Shamrock, Copropriete Du Navire Shamrock, Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Maine.
ORDER FOR THE INTERLOCUTORY SALE OF THE M/V SHAMROCK
SINGAL, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the Expedited Motion of Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V. for Interlocutory Sale of the M/V Shamrock (Docket # 70). The Court received status reports from the parties and held a hearing on this request for relief on September 13, 2004.
Pursuant to Supplemental Rule E(9)(b) and for good cause shown in accordance with Supplemental Rule E(9)(b)(i)(B) &...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
