1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 461 F.Supp.2d
  5. 461 F.Supp.2d 1 (2004)
 

REIGNER v. INGERSOLL-RAND CO.

No. CIV.A. 04-1769(JR).

461 F.Supp.2d 1 (2004)

Nathan Peter REIGNER, Plaintiff, v. INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

November 23, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter Elmer Diercks, Jeffrey Harris, Rubin, Winston, Diercks, Harris & Cooke, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Jennifer Ancona Semko, Baker & McKenzie, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

ROBERTSON, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiff Nathan Peter Reigner, "in his representative capacity acting for the interests of the general public," asserts a cause of action under the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act, D.C.Code § 28-3901, et seq., against the manufacturer of the Kryptonite brand tubular cylinder lock. He alleges that the lock contains a design flaw that permits it to be opened...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases