1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 319 F.Supp.2d
  5. 319 F.Supp.2d 32 (2004)
 

JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Nos. CIV.A.01-0981(PLF), CIV.A.01-2545(PLF), CIV.A.02-1330(PLF).

319 F.Supp.2d 32 (2004)

JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, et al., Defendants. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Plaintiff, v. United States Department of Energy, Defendant. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Department of Interior, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 26, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry Elliott Klayman, James F. Peterson, Judicial Watch, Inc., Washington, DC, Paul J. Orfanedes, Klayman & Associates, PC, Washington, DC, for Judicial Watch, Inc.

Howard Mesnikoff Crystal, Eric Robert Glitzenstein, Meyer & Glitzenstein, Washington, DC, Sharon Buccino, Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC, for Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Daniel Edward Bensing, Anne L. Weismann, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Fed. Programs Branch, Washington, DC, Gilian Flory, William Alvarado Rivera, Elizabeth J. Shapiro, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Federal Programs Branch, Washington, DC, for Dept of Agriculture.

Daniel Edward Bensing, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Fed. Programs Branch, Washington, DC, Elizabeth J. Shapiro, Anne L. Weismann, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Federal Programs Branch, Washington, DC, for Dept. of Energy.

Daniel Edward Bensing, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Fed. Programs Branch, Washington, DC, Elizabeth J. Shapiro, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Federal Programs Branch, Washington, DC, for Bureau of Land Management.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendants' motion for reconsideration of this Court's Opinion of March 31, 2004 and motion for a stay pending appeal. Upon consideration of defendants' motion, plaintiffs' opposition, defendants' reply and plaintiffs' surreply, the Court concludes that defendants' motion for reconsideration should be denied, but that defendants' motion for a stay pending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases