1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 332 F.Supp.2d
  5. 332 F.Supp.2d 11 (2004)
 

AAMC v. PRINCETON REVIEW, INC.

No. CIV.A.03-00716(HHK).

332 F.Supp.2d 11 (2004)

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, Plaintiff, v. The PRINCETON REVIEW, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

June 22, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Burgoyne, Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Jay Ward Brown, Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP, Washington, DC, Roger Lloyd Zissu, Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, PC, New York City, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KENNEDY, District Judge.

Charging The Princeton Review, Inc. ("Princeton Review") with copyright infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets and fraud, the Association of American Medical Colleges ("AAMC"), brings this action alleging that Princeton Review unlawfully compromised the confidentiality and security of AAMC's Medical College Admission Test ("MCAT"). This action is brought under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases