1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 5 A.D.3d
  5. 5 A.D.3d 220 (2004)
 

PEOPLE v. BARRIENTO

5 A.D.3d 220 (2004)

772 N.Y.S.2d 824

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL BARRIENTO, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 16, 2004.

We conclude that under the circumstances presented, the report made by the younger of the two victims was too long after the events to qualify for admission under the "prompt outcry" exception to the hearsay rule. However, we find the error to be harmless (see People v Leon, 209 A.D.2d 342 [1994], lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 1034 [1995]).

The court properly sustained the People's objection to a question defendant asked on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases