WOODWORTH v. JOYCE


860 A.2d 979 (2004)

373 N.J. Super. 114

Edward K. WOODWORTH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Peter E. JOYCE, Defendant-Appellant, and Rofel T. Flores, Defendant. Rofel Flores, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Peter E. Joyce, Defendant-Appellant, and Judy Belinda Williams and Edward K. Woodworth, Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 24, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michelle Wall, Paramus, argued the cause for appellant, Peter E. Joyce (Melli, Guerin & Wall, P.C., attorneys; Ms. Wall, of counsel; Jennifer L. Sanyshyn, on the brief).

Dolores L. Aretsky, Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent, Edward K. Woodworth (Aretsky & Aretsky, attorneys; Ms. Aretsky, of counsel; Eric J. Aretsky, on the brief).

Edward M. Colligan argued the cause for respondent, Rofel Flores (Colligan & Colligan, attorneys; Mr. Colligan, on the brief).

Before Judges CONLEY, BRAITHWAITE and WINKELSTEIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

WINKELSTEIN, J.A.D.

The issue presented in this opinion is whether a driver who causes an accident while under the influence of alcohol is entitled to the benefits of the verbal threshold provision of an injured plaintiff's insurance policy. In this case, defendant Peter Joyce had a blood alcohol level of .16 at the time he caused an accident injuring plaintiffs. He pleaded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases