1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 853 A.2d
  5. 853 A.2d 887 (2004)
 

STATE v. PINEIRO

853 A.2d 887 (2004)

181 N.J. 13

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jose R. PINEIRO, a/k/a Pinaro, David Pineiro and Jose A. Pineiro, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided August 2, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michele A. Adubato, Designated Counsel, Bayonne, argued the cause for appellant (Yvonne Smith Segars, Public Defender, attorney).

Frank Muroski, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Justice WALLACE delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this search and seizure case, following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, defendant pled guilty to possession of drugs based on evidence seized after a warrantless arrest. As in State v. Moore, also decided today, 181 N.J. 40, 853 A.2d 903, 2004 WL 1713632 (2004), we review whether the State had reasonable suspicion to make an investigatory stop...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases