1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 303 F.Supp.2d
  5. 303 F.Supp.2d 1253 (2004)
 

ANDERSON v. FORD MOTOR CO.

No. CIV.03-867-C.

303 F.Supp.2d 1253 (2004)

Mary Jane ANDERSON and John Anderson, Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and Texas Instruments, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma.

As Amended March 10, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cary D. Dooley, Cathcart & Dooley, Scott D. Caldwell, Cathcart & Dooley, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiffs.

Curtis L. Smith, Chubbuck, Smith, Rhodes, Stewart & Elder, Ronald L. Walker, McKinney & Stringer-OKC, Toby M. McKinstry, McKinney & Stringer-OKC, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendants.

ORDER

CAUTHRON, District Judge.

Despite having withheld service on Defendants Ford Motor Company and Texas Instruments for more than twenty months, Plaintiffs Mary Jane Anderson and John Anderson now ask the Court to remand this diversity action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) because Defendants removed more than one year after the case commenced. For the reasons explained below, Plaintiffs' motion to remand is denied.

I. Background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases