1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 336 F.Supp.2d
  5. 336 F.Supp.2d 867 (2004)
 

ARDISAM, INC. v. AMERISTEP, INC.

No. 03-C-553-C.

336 F.Supp.2d 867 (2004)

ARDISAM, INC., d/b/a Yukon Tracks and Spring Form, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. AMERISTEP, INC., Hunter's View, Ltd. and Eastman Outdoors, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

August 2, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jon G. Furlow, Karna A. Berg, for Plaintiffs.

William F. Bauer, Coyne, Niess, Schultz, Becker & Bauer, Paul W. Schwarzenbart, Lee, Kilkelly, Paulson & Younger, Eugenia G. Carter, La Follette, Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Madison, WI, Marshall G. Macfarlane, Young & Basile, P.C., Ann Arbor, MI, Anthony J. Kane, Terhaar, Archibald, Pfefferle & Griebel, LLP, Minneapolis, MN, Angelo J. Bufalino, Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, Chicago, IL, Kristin L. Murphy, Rader, Fishman & Grauer, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

CRABB, District Judge.

In this civil action for declaratory, monetary and injunctive relief, plaintiffs Ardisam, Inc. and Spring Form, Inc. contend that defendants Ameristep, Inc., Hunter's View, Ltd. and Eastman Outdoors infringed plaintiffs' U.S. Patent No. 5,038,812 (the '812 patent) by making, using, selling and offering for sale hunting blinds that utilize and embody the patented invention, which is a "quickly erectable, quickly collapsible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases