1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 853 A.2d
  5. 853 A.2d 280 (2004)
 

SEABROOK VILLAGE v. MURPHY

853 A.2d 280 (2004)

371 N.J.Super. 319

SEABROOK VILLAGE, Respondent-Respondent, v. John MURPHY, Petitioner-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 21, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mandelbaum, Salsburg, Gold, Lazris, Discenza & Steinberg, West Orange, for appellant (Owen T. Hughes, of counsel; Gail M. Cookson, on the brief).

Archer & Greiner, for respondent (Arthur H. Jones, Haddonfield and Robert J. Fogg, Princeton, on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, COLLESTER and FUENTES.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, J.A.D.

Petitioner John Murphy appeals from the final decision of the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs (DCA), Bureau of Homeowner Protection. In its decision, the DCA determined that Seabrook Village was legally entitled to cancel its Residence and Care Agreement with petitioner and discharge him from its facility for his (1) refusal to pay monthly service fees and (2) failure to execute a release...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases