OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
I. SUMMARY
Appellant Bellot argues that the Territorial Court abused its discretion by improperly denying appellant's motion for acquittal because he suffered from a mental illness, and that his actions were a direct result of that illness. Because the trial court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, this Court will affirm Bellot's conviction.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On September...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.