1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 73 P.3d
  5. 73 P.3d 840 (2003)
 

BARNTHOUSE v. CITY OF EDMOND

No. 97,350.

73 P.3d 840 (2003)

2003 OK 42

Timothy Ray BARNTHOUSE, Ancel Scott Fees and James Dallas Teel, II, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF EDMOND, a municipal corporation and Dennis Cochran, individually and in his capacity as the Chief of Police of the City of Edmond, Defendants/Appellees.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

April 22, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip W. Anderson, Kent R. McGuire, Oklahoma City, OK, for Appellants.

Richard J. Goralewicz, Oklahoma City, OK, and Stephen T. Murdock, City of Edmond, Edmond, OK, for Appellees.

OPINION

WATT, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 The dispositive questions in this appeal are: (1) Did Appellants have a property interest in their employment and rank as Sergeants? (2) If so, did Appellees deprive them of that interest and violate their due process rights by demoting them without a hearing? (3) Did the trial court erroneously hold City and Cochran were entitled to judgment as a matter of law? We answer all questions in the affirmative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases