1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 75 Conn.
  5. 75 Conn. App. 819 (2003)
 

CHADHA v. SHIMELMAN

(AC 22129).

75 Conn. App. 819 (2003)

MOHINDER P. CHADHA v. MYER B. SHIMELMAN ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released April 1, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mohinder P. Chadha, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

Thomas J. Ring, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Richard J. Lynch, assistant attorney general, for the appellees (defendants).

Lavery, C. J., and Foti and Landau, Js.

Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The plaintiff, Mohinder P. Chadha, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants, Myer B. Shimelman and Neil J. Grey, following the granting of their motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) applied the wrong definition of "malice," (2) determined that he failed to present a factual predicate for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases