1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 257 F.Supp.2d
  5. 257 F.Supp.2d 520 (2003)
 

WURTZEL v. STARBUCKS COFFEE CO.

No. 01CV0324TCPMLO.

257 F.Supp.2d 520 (2003)

Deborah WURTZEL, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

April 11, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeremy J. Deutsch, Deutsch, Tane, Waterman & Wurtzel, New York City, for Deborah Wurtzel, plaintiff.

George N. Tompkins, Jr., George N. Tompkins, III, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP, New York City, for Starbucks Coffee Company, defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PLATT, District Judge.

Defendant Starbucks Coffee Company ("Starbucks" or "Defendant") moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, dismissing the Complaint of Plaintiff Deborah Wurtzel ("Wurtzel" or "Plaintiff). Defendant also seeks to preclude the testimony of Plaintiffs proposed expert, Robert I. Goldberg, Ph.D., based on the criteria set...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases