HALEY v. FORCELLE

No. A03-182.

669 N.W.2d 48 (2003)

Jack HALEY, et al., Respondents, v. Estelle FORCELLE, et al., Appellants, Dennis Forcelle, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 23, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph W. Anthony, Steven M. Pincus, Anthony Ostlund & Baer, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

James F. Baldwin, Barry Lazarus, Philip J. Young, Moss & Barnett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellants Estelle Forcelle, et al. and Dennis Forcelle.

William Z. Pentelovitch, Maslon, Edelman, Borman & Brand, LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant Dennis Forcelle.

Considered and decided by HALBROOKS, Presiding Judge, TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge, and FORSBERG, Judge.


OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellants Dennis and Estelle Forcelle challenge the district court's imposition of a temporary injunction. Appellants argue that (1) the district court abused its discretion in imposing a temporary injunction because the Dahlberg factors do not support injunctive relief and respondents Jack and Brenda Haley have not suffered irreparable harm; (2) respondents are prohibited from asserting a claim for equitable relief because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases