1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 277 F.Supp.2d
  5. 277 F.Supp.2d 367 (2003)
 

TA INSTRUMENTS, INC. v. PERKIN-ELMER CORP.

No. CIV.A.95-545-SLR.

277 F.Supp.2d 367 (2003)

TA INSTRUMENTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

July 31, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard K. Herrmann, Esquire and Mary B. Matterer, Esquire of Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, Counsel for Plaintiff. Of Counsel: Lawrence J. Gotts, Esquire, Aslan Baghdadi, Esquire and David C. Issacson, Esquire of Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, Virginia.

Richard L. Horwitz, Esquire of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, Counsel for Defendant. Of Counsel: Walter E. Hanley, Jr., Esquire, James Galbraith, Esquire, Mark M. Supko, Esquire and Jeffery S. Ginsberg, Esquire of Kenyon & Kenyon, New York, New York.

AMENDED OPINION*

ROBINSON, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On September 7, 1995, plaintiff TA Instruments, Inc. ("TA") filed this action against defendant The Perkin-Elmer Corporation ("PE"), alleging infringement of certain claims of United States Patent Nos. 5,224,775 (the "'775 patent"), 5,346,306 (the "'306 patent"), and 5,439,291 (the "'291 patent") (collectively, the "TA patents"). Generally speaking, these patents disclose an analytical technique...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases