1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 264 Conn.
  5. 264 Conn. 307 (2003)
 

WU v. CHANG

(SC 16751).

264 Conn. 307 (2003)

KO SHU MEI WU ET AL. v. CHUNG-MING CHANG.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released June 10, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Timothy McNamara, for the appellant (defendant).

John B. Nolan, for the appellee (named plaintiff).

Ingrid L. Moll, with whom was Charles D. Ray and, on the brief, William H. Bright, Jr., for the appellee (plaintiff Paul Yeh).

Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille and Zarella, Js.

Opinion

PALMER, J.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether a claim of fraud tolls the thirty day period within which a motion to vacate an arbitration award must be filed pursuant to General Statutes § 52-420 (b).1 We conclude that the trial court properly determined that a claim of fraud does not toll that thirty day period and, accordingly, we affirm the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases