1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 340 F.Supp.2d
  5. 340 F.Supp.2d 197 (2003)
 

COCKFIELD v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

No. 3:00CV564(JBA).

340 F.Supp.2d 197 (2003)

Roland COCKFIELD v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., PRATT & WHITNEY DIVISION

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

September 30, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles G. Parks, Jr., Parks & Associates, Stamford, CT, for Plaintiff.

US Court of Appeals, New York City, Kurosh L. Marjani, Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & Kuriansky, Stamford, CT, Albert Zakarian, Daniel Adam Schwartz, Day, Berry & Howard, Hartford, CT, Meredith G. Diette, Brown Jacobson, Norwich, CT, for Defendant.

Memorandum of Opinion and Order

ARTERTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Roland Cockfield, employed by defendant United Technologies Corp., Pratt & Whitney Division ("Pratt") from December 1964 until his termination on June 28, 1991, alleges Pratt fired him on account of his race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and not, as Pratt contends, because of violation of the company's rules. The Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases